Hangover Copyright Infringement of Tyson Tattoo?

Share:

Hangover Copyright Infringement of Tyson Tattoo?

TattooThe Hangover: Part II, set to hit theaters this Thursday, will not be hampered by a copyright infringement lawsuit, at least for now. The tattoo on Mike Tyson’s face was done by tattoo artist S. Victor Whitmill, and Whitmill’s work is distinct enough that he doesn’t want anyone copying it. That includes Ed Helms’ character, in the second installment of the Hangover saga. The problem is that Helms’ tattoo wasn’t done by Whitmill, and he claims Warner Bros. took unlawful liberty in reproducing his distinct style on someone else’s face. Someone else’s high-profile face, that is. The tattoo factors highly in the marketing campaign for the film.
According to the lawsuit: “Warner Bros. copied Mr. Whitmill’s Original Tattoo and placed it on the face of another actor … This unauthorized exploitation of the Original Tattoo constitutes copyright infringement.”
Whitman sued Warner Bros. for copyright infringement (Case No. 4:11-cv-00752-CDP, Missouri Eastern District Court), and wanted an injunction to stop the release of the movie. Fortunately for fans, a judge denied the injunction today in federal court. However, the suit was not thrown out, and it will be interesting to see how it plays out.
Los Angeles Trademark Lawyer

Author

  • Patent and Trademark attorney Michael Cohen

    Michael N. Cohen is a Los Angeles based Intellectual Property attorney and founder of Cohen IP Law Group, P.C. For over 20 years, he has provided nuanced and sophisticated IP and business litigation services to a diverse clientele. His practice focuses on patent and trademark prosecution and litigation, as well as complex business and internet law disputes for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 companies. Michael is a registered patent attorney admitted to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

    View all posts

Schedule a Confidential Consultation

Latest Posts

Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on patentlawip.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship.